One way our democracy could be improved is by changing the rules as to filibustering in the U. S. Senate. This comes from an article in the New York Times 8-28-10. The widespread use of the filibuster is a recent development. Part of the problem lies with today's partisan culture, in which blocking the other party takes priority over passing legislation or confirming candidates. For instance, a bill to extend unemployment benefits in late 2009 faced two filibusters--despite its bipartisan backing and its eventual passage 98 to 0. To pass the bill, it took 4 weeks, including 7 days of floor debate. Under the present procedures, the burden is on the majority party to end discussion and bring ta bill to a vote, rather than on the filibustering minority to prevent a vote. Now, if a single senator objects to a cloture of debate, the majority must have 60 senators, on the floor, to vote in favor of cloture. The rules should be changed so that to continue debate on a bill 40 senators, on the floor, would have to vote to continue the debate, and this vote could come up every 3 hours while the senate is in continuous session.
Thursday, September 2, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment